Educators are Coming for Our
Children … But Do We Care?
Published in Marietta (GA) Daily Journal July 30, 2017
Nat King Cole’s “lazy, hazy, crazy
days of summer” are upon us, a time during which Americans like to escape their
routine if and when they can. And school
has already started?
For those who can manage to get away
for a break, here’s a message that awaits them when they return: your kids’ school
started while you were gone.
Families had better enjoy the open road while
they can because the American summer is being chipped away. School boards seem set on the idea of
starting school while the weather is still sweltering. The trend is to start school early and give
students a couple or more breaks between starting time and Christmas. (The Winter Solstice, that is. I keep forgetting that Christmas is a bad
word at school, though the Celtic pagan religion expression, “winter holidays,”
is not.)
Formal schooling is important, but
it’s only a part of our total lives and our learning. Formal schooling isn’t the only kind there
is. Children and youth can learn outside
the classroom. They learn from trips,
from Mom and Dad, Grandma and Grandpa, Uncle Joe, neighbors, summer jobs,
recreation, and chores. They learn to
live life with their families and away from their peers.
There
are two reasons why these early start dates are not good. One is educational, the other, cultural.
MDJ letter writer and teacher,
Melissa Anderson, recently hit the nail on the head, arguing that when the
break times come, at least two instructional days are lost, the day before the
break when students are too excited, and the day of return when they are
comatose. I know from experience, also, that such breaks don’t serve students
well. Teachers lose ground. Students lose tempo and interest. Surely we adults remember what it was like
returning to school after Chris … , I mean winter holidays.
Shortened summers are bad culturally. Extended
summers, while good for the economy, also curb the impact of teen culture. Teens need to be around adults more. They are spending too much time with each
other. Too many parents don’t realize that school is now a subculture, one that
can suck teenagers in and woo them away from the habits and values they have
been taught at home.
This reality is no fault of principals
or teachers. It’s the nature of the
beast. Although I realize big schools
are what we’re stuck with, a thousand or more or even several hundred teens in
one place is a bad idea. Teens quickly
become each other’s confidants, teachers, comforters, counselors, and chief
influencers. Only the strongest of
homes, as havens of love and dispensers of discipline, can keep their offspring
from being enveloped by the negative aspects of teen culture. Yes, including its music, its dress, trends,
moral values, language, and most seriously, its obsession with conformity. Teen culture’s beachhead is the school, but
it exists apart from and in spite of the school. Sheer numbers feed it and give it life.
Schools deserve some of the blame
for youth culture’s direction - in music and dress, particularly. If rock is their music at home and out and
about – with its primitive rhythms and coarsening lyrics - why not a different
kind of music at ball games and in the cafeteria? Classical music would appeal to far more
teens than anyone realizes. Why give teens what they already have?
Schools to teens: “At home do what your
parents allow. That’s really none of our
business. But at school, we will not
give you what you already have.”
And
dress? God help us. School boards should fight parents on this one: “At home, dress like a vagabond, listen to
loud music, use terrible English, but school is a place where standards are
aspired to, expectations are held up, excellence is taught, one’s best is
demanded.”
Oh,
how we have fallen. Not just schools.
All of us. The culture has gone
from “Shall the pot command the potter?” to “We must identify with youth.” It’s quite unfair to blame educators
totally. Yes, doctrinaire educators want
our children, but many parents are apparently willing to let schools have their
children.
Another
thing. To me there are few things more
heartbreaking or more foreboding for a nation than the expression “Pre-K.” PRE-kindergarten? Where are parents? Is the delivery room the next destination for
the nanny state educationists?
Yes,
educators are coming for our children.
Busy, hardworking parents need to take notice.
Roger
Hines
7/26/17
No comments:
Post a Comment