Monday, May 2, 2016

Public Ed Isn’t Always Public … or Publicly Influenced

             Public Ed Isn’t Always Public … or Publicly Influenced

                                                Published in Marietta Daily Journal May 1, 2016

            The waning school year might be a good time to ask who the chief influencers of public education are.
            Public education is a complex endeavor and gets more so each year.  How far we have come from Mark Hopkins on one end of a log and Abe Lincoln on the other.  One wonders if our vastly increased sophistication has vastly increased learning.  Abe did pretty well, you know, despite the log classroom and studying by fireplace light.
            Public schools have become the instrument by which groups of all stripes try to move their agendas. Got an idea that advances your ideology?  Get it into the curriculum or persuade schools to celebrate ____?___ Day (fill in the blank).  It would seem that reading, writing, arithmetic, a survey of history, the sciences, the arts, and computer competency would be the primary time consumers at school.  Even if they are, there are distractions.
            Sports, music and other such good, non-core studies aren’t the distractions.  The distractions – some old, some new – are drug ed, bullying, Earth Day, sensitivity training, sexual assault prevention, gender identity, diversity training, fuzzy math, multiculturalism, and incessant testing, to name only a fraction of them.  If your school hasn’t been touched (or swept) by these non-academic social diversions, hold on tight.  The tide of social transformation is coming in.
            Compare the above list of non-academic pre-occupations to the following: mathematics, English, history, geography, literature, foreign languages, technology, biology, physiology, chemistry, social skills, and character education.  Which list sounds more like real education and less like social engineering?  Which does your child or grandchild need more?  Who are the influencers that push each of the lists?
            Strangely, the subject matter teacher organizations to which many public school classroom teachers belong don’t always push the right list.  I’m referring to private groups such as the National Council of Teachers of English, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, and National Council for Social Studies.
            There are many others with various names.  My purpose is not to demonize, but to scrutinize these organizations, and to remind parents that there are countless influencers like these who shape their child’s education, some of which hold social views quite opposite to those of parents.  Your own local school principal, school board member, and  state school superintendent are all but a tiny part of the big picture we call public education.  There are many influencers and most of them are not local and are not known.
The word “council” is misleading.  The National Council for Teachers of English (NCTE) is not a council.  It is a 40,000 member organization that writes standards, curricula, reading lists, etc., and lobbies state school boards and publishers to adopt them.  Sounds ok until you check to see what’s in those offerings.
            For 20 years or so I was a member of NCTE and its local state affiliate.  Its national conventions were beneficial when their sessions focused on the teaching of English.  But like so many other organizations that lose touch with their rank and file, NCTE became a politicized, resolution-passing body.  It began passing resolutions on women’s rights, homosexual rights, union rights, classroom teachers’ rights, student rights, and minority rights.  Soon English instruction got buried as politics was elevated.
            This trend of going political, and progressive at that, has marked most of the other subject matter classroom teacher groups.  Like so many educational leaders, these organizations like to blame parents when academic achievement declines: parents are too busy; they don’t spend time with their children and don’t read to them any more. (I doubt that Lincoln’s parents did any of this.  Mine didn’t.  Coming from the fields, they were mighty tired at night.)  “Therefore,” say the ideological professional educators, “Give us your kids.”
            Classroom teacher organizations are probably outnumbered by the administrator organizations.  All of the following private groups must get their two cents in and are well organized to do so locally and nationally: school superintendents, principals, board members, curriculum co-coordinators, counselors, testing specialists, PTA, and countless others.
            Oh yeah, Uncle Sam.  Uncle Sam is really a paper tiger, but he still influences by dangling his Department of Education money.   But to receive it, states must jump through hoops and accept such things as Common Core.  School leaders usually choose to jump.
            And you don’t think the LGBT community knocks on the school door to talk about curriculum?  So do Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jane Fonda.
            So many voices, such weighty rigmarole.  See why so many parents turn to home schooling and private school?   Conservative Americans have cracked the media, but they haven’t touched public education.

Roger Hines

4/27/16

No comments:

Post a Comment