Sunday, February 2, 2020

Rudyard Kipling was Wrong


                           Rudyard Kipling was Wrong

               Published in Marietta (GA) Daily Journal, 2/2/20

            Oh, East is East and West is West and never the twain shall meet.
             Kipling wrote these words in 1889 in his poem, “The Ballad of East and West.”  Born in India to distinguished British academics, Kipling was educated in England but returned to India to become a journalist.  Though a lover of Britain and a defender of the West, he considered himself an “Anglo-Indian.”
            Another Kipling poem, “The White Man’s Burden,” troubled many readers.  Was the poem a condescending justification of imperialistic European racism or a sincere call to Westerners to uplift the poverty-stricken, freedom-denied peoples of India and the entire East?
            A casual reading of Kipling’s classic children’s stories and incisive poems will show that Kipling was no racist.  He celebrated the lands of which he wrote; their people, that is, not their politics.  Winner of the 1907 Nobel Prize for Literature, Kipling believed that the West held values that the East needed.  At the end of his life, however, Kipling was convinced that because of poverty and political tyranny, all efforts to bring the East and West together would come to naught.
            But that was then (Kipling died in 1936); this is now.  Today the East is coming to the West, the opposite of what Kipling hoped for.  This doesn’t mean “the twain” have met or made peace.  It means the West is allowing the quiet invasion of Eastern values and systems, particularly centralized government.
            Today one of the leading candidates for the Presidency is an avowed “democratic” socialist. Sen. Bernie Sanders frequently attempts to explain what a “democratic” socialist is.  He need not.  Socialism, whatever adjective you attach to it, is the enemy – yea, the end – of individual liberty.  It extols the nebulous “village” to the detriment of every non-nebulous, breathing individual villager.  It’s an –ism that has oozed from afar into America for decades and is now heralded by at least two serious presidential candidates.  Illegal immigration has fueled this –ism.
Along with competitor Elizabeth Warren, Sanders would bring to America the central planning of the East such as that of China and Saudi Arabia.  Central planning for such things as free higher education, Medicare for all, the death of private insurance, gun confiscation, etc., requires central government power.  These two Robin Hood candidates are enjoying strong support from college students and other young adults, indicating that the ways of the East have already established a considerable foothold.
No, no.  Sanders and Warren favor Swedish socialism, their supporters claim.  Sweden is approximately the size of California.  Practically any system can function in a small nation.  For a continental nation like America, China-like controls are necessary for the socialistic measures now proposed by the nation’s left.
            What precisely is the difference between the East and the West?  The Greeks were the first Westerners.  Their fledgling democracy and love for beauty, philosophy, and debate were handed off to Rome, then to early modern Europe, then to early America, with liberty increasing every mile of the way. Contrast this path to that of Eastern nations where exultant freedom simply never took root.  While Herodotus, Cicero, Blackstone, and Jefferson preached freedom and its attendant progress, nations great and small east of the Mediterranean continued to dwell in tyrannical darkness.  With few exceptions such as India, the East has never championed democracy as has the Western world.  This is particularly true of the Middle Eastern Islamic-dominated nations.
            In Europe, Western values are dying.  According to Jonathan Steele in “The New Migration,” Europe’s aging population is a present reality.  This population gap is being filled, says Roger Cohen of the New York Times, and is best illustrated by Germany where 7 million of its 80 million people are Eastern-born and unschooled in free markets and representative government.
            As this column has asked before, if multiculturalism works, why since 1990 have the USSR, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia splintered into 21 nations?  Why the ongoing secessionist movements in Spain, Italy, and alas, the U.K?  Why the strife-ridden situation in London’s Muslim-dominated borough of Tower Hamlets where I visited recently and learned that Muslims and non-Muslims are so often in conflict?
The introduction above is incomplete. Kipling’s next line is “Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God’s Great Judgment Seat.”  But that’s why he’s wrong.  We are ahead of Kipling’s schedule.  If easternized Europe is a dead man walking, how long will it take for America to see that invasions must be resisted, that commonality of some kind is every civilization’s glue, and that every American should honor the Western values that have kept us free and fed?
Socialism is not one of those values.


Roger Hines
1/29/20
           

No comments:

Post a Comment