Forget
the Past? Forget That!
Published in Marietta (GA) Daily Journal, 1/20/19
Over
two decades ago I watched and listened as columnist William F. Buckley sat and
talked with his television show guest, Arthur Schlesinger. The PBS show, “Firing Line,” was always a
genuine exchange of ideas and beliefs about all things cultural. There was no shouting, not even when
differences of opinion were distinctly drawn and strongly held. Those were the days before the children and grandchildren
of the 60s took over and gave us the childish, non-productive yelling we have
today.
Buckley,
who should always be heralded as the most effective megaphone of modern
conservatism, had sealed his dynamic literary and rhetorical future with a book
he wrote only two years after graduating from Yale . In “God and Man at Yale,” the young Buckley
faulted his alma mater for its hostility to Christianity and free
enterprise. In 1951 we were not using
the expression “went viral,” but that’s exactly what the book did.
In
1951 our universities, whether public or private, were considered national
monuments. No one spoke of them in the way Buckley
described Yale. University professors
were untouchables. But the highly
educated Buckley would have none of the fawning praise poured on higher
education. He had witnessed too much of
academia’s growing disdain for our Founders, our free enterprise system, and
our foundational Judeo-Christian ethic.
A “Yankee” if there ever was one, Buckley’s libertarian/conservative
views were more in line with those of Southerners than of his high-caste New
England and London raising.
Arthur
Schlesinger, on the other hand, was a liberal professor, a Kennedy advisor and
biographer. Politically, he and Buckley
could not have been further apart. What
they held in common was a love for history and a strong belief that it should
be taught objectively. They also spoke
often of the need of intellectual history (the history of ideas and
philosophies), not just political history (dates, wars, elections).
As
Buckley and Schlesinger discussed the value of historical studies on “Firing
Line,” it wasn’t Buckley the wordsmith who uttered the chief quote of the
day. It was his political opposite Schlesinger,
the history professor. Schlesinger commented, “I believe history is
to the nation what memory is to the individual.”
And
so it is. We speak often of people we
know who are perhaps losing either their short term or long term memory. But ponder the ramifications of a nation that
does the same thing. How can freedom be
understood, appreciated, or preserved if our knowledge of its path is shady or
even nonexistent? How, without history
knowledge, can we know who we are as a nation?
Much
worse than losing one’s memory is never having one in the first place, yet this
is the condition many Americans find themselves in now. How many children today don’t remember their
father because they never saw him? How
many teens know nothing of free enterprise because they dropped out of school
just before reaching American history or economics?
In
recent conversation with Carol Paschal, founder and director of Cobb Street
Ministries, she told the heart-breaking story of a 4-year-old boy who asked her,
“Miss Carol, what’s a daddy?” Readers
who know Carol and know about her relentless efforts to help people will also
know that the child was answered lovingly and forthrightly. This child had no
memory loss. He had no knowledge of a
father to forget.
Buckley
asserted 68 years ago that academia was responsible for much of America’s
forgetfulness. His assertions were
prophetic. His death in 2008 prevented
him from knowing of how students at Washington and Lee University are clamoring
to have monuments of their school’s namesakes removed, of how the mayor of New
Orleans has treated certain statues there, or what Georgia gubernatorial
candidate Stacey Abrams said about Stone Mountain. Like Faulkner, Buckley believed the past
isn’t even past and that “it’s useless to try burying it.”
In
“God and Man at Yale,” Buckley wrote, “I propose to expose what I regard as an
extraordinarily irresponsible educational attitude which, under the protective
label, ‘academic freedom,’ has produced one of the most extraordinary
incongruities of our time: the institution that derives its moral and financial
support from Christian individualists and then addresses itself to the task of
persuading the sons of their supporters to be atheistic socialists.”
History
we don’t like is still our history. I
hope that I never forget Stalin, Hitler, or the black children who walked past
my house to a school shack while I rode into town on a new Bluebird school bus
to a nice building.
I
also hope Buckley will be read and heeded for a long, long time.
Roger Hines
1/11/19
No comments:
Post a Comment