How
Conservatives Learned to Fight
Published in Marietta (GA) Daily Journal 12/3/17
There
is one primary reason for the political divide that characterizes America
today. It isn’t President Trump or his
tweets, nor our two political parties, per se; nor race, religion, or
regionalism.
The
primary reason for the constant heated arguing is that both sides now have a
platform from which to speak their piece.
This was not the case before cable television and Rush Limbaugh marched
onto the stage of our political consciousness and firmly planted their flags.
By
both sides, I mean liberals and conservatives, though it’s clear these two
labels are fading due to the rising populism/nationalism made manifest by
Donald Trump’s election. Before cable,
Limbaugh, Fox News, and conservative talk radio, there was little fighting,
essentially because there was no debate stage for conservatives to stand on to
engage in philosophical battle.
Conservatives had no megaphone.
ABC,
CBS, and NBC reigned supreme. When these three big networks ruled the airwaves,
practically all of their news anchors and reporters were FDR/JFK/LBJ/Clinton water
boys. Walter Cronkite, Ted Koppel, and
Tom Brokaw weren’t exactly closet conservatives. Their allegiances were just as obvious as are
those of Wolfe Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, and Rachel Maddow today.
During the decades of
liberal media dominance, there were conservative voices, but they were muted. William F. Buckley was an unrelenting undercurrent
of conservative thought, but despite his
intellect and his stellar National Review magazine, he and his readers remained
strangers in a strange land.
Just
as Barry Goldwater birthed Ronald Reagan, so did Buckley birth Rush
Limbaugh. In 1988 a liberal friend asked
me if I had heard “that Limbaugh guy”. I
had not.
“You’ll
like him,” she added. “He’s pro-life.”
Hearing
Limbaugh for the first time, I was surprised by joy. Never on radio or television had I heard
anyone challenge – and cheerfully, at that – the default philosophy of the
media and higher education. Although
Reagan was in office in 1988, many Republicans were still merely Democrat lite,
sadly resigned to the hold liberals had on the culture.
Not
that William Buckley wasn’t still trying.
But his greatest strength, his erudition, was also his greatest
weakness. Like his protégé, George Will
(whose recent fall from grace would render the now deceased Buckley
heartbroken), Buckley simply used too many big words. Limbaugh used big words too, but he knew when
his audience needed them broken down.
By
1994 when Republicans gained control of the U.S. House for the first time since
1952, conservative voices were everywhere.
Goldwater’s stern face had yielded Reagan’s smile. Buckley’s intellectualism had yielded
Limbaugh’s common touch. Newt Gingrich
was offering hope by teaching conservatives how to fight. What Buckley, Limbaugh, and Gingrich sowed,
Donald Trump reaped.
The
voice that really broke free conservative expression and started all the
yelling between pundits of different persuasions was John McLaughlin and his
PBS show, “The McLaughlin Group.” Since
then, we’ve been yelling. At least
television personalities have been.
Friends have asked me if I am not bothered by
Donald Trump’s past and his overly quick responses. My answer is “Yes, but…” George W. Bush, a man of class and dignity,
suffered the slings and arrows of the media without saying much. So did Mitt
Romney. I always wished they would fight
back as Trump does now. Did they not see
that the media engages in advocacy?
Statesmanship
doesn’t mean that an elected official should take everything that’s thrown at
him or her. Frankly, I enjoy seeing the
media stars turned into pretzels by the President. The first amendment grants to the media neither
priesthood nor freedom from criticism, and President Trump is the first
president I know of who has told them so.
As the saying goes,
“Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who have one.” With technology in the palm of our hands, all
of us now have free press, so why not use it?
FDR did just that with his radio “fireside chats,” bypassing and
angering the press as well.
Critics want Trump to be “proper” and
“dignified,” yet, since the ‘60s the White House press corps has been everything
but “proper” or “dignified.”
Children and
grandchildren of the ‘60s, having re-defined marriage, made abortion legal, and
even created a new “gender” for us, may be gasping their last political breath. If Mr. Trump can continue to frustrate them,
I’m with him.
Conservatives would
best view Trump as their clear and present hope and acknowledge that sometimes
you just have to fight.
Roger Hines
11/29/17
No comments:
Post a Comment