Sunday, January 10, 2016

The High Cost of Rings vs Their Low Returns

               The High Cost of Rings vs Their Low Returns

                                                                      Published in Marietta Daily Journal Jan. 10, 2016

            As soon as I deliver this column to my editor, I’ll be leaving town.  Mainly because there is no columnist protection program that I know of.
            I’m even a little nervous about my two grown sons reading this.  Both of them were high school athletes, are still sports lovers, and can give you the bio and statistics on every college and professional athlete and coach in the nation.  I say only “a little nervous” because I’m also thinking they might – might – agree with me.  While they were growing up they occasionally made comments that indicated they were critical thinkers, even about things they loved and believed in.  That’s good, but … regarding this topic, we shall see.
            First, my respectful, obligatory bow to those with whom I am taking issue, namely college presidents who allow football to rule the roost at their institutions, fans who think colleges exist to provide them with four months of pleasure per year, and politicians who make life easy for billionaires.  Their hearts may be right, but their designs are fraught with error.  More on this momentarily.
            Notice that I didn’t include coaches or athletes.  Perhaps I should, perhaps not.  I hasten to remind us that a huge number of college athletes are all of 19 years old.  They are in a system not of their making.  They are merely taking advantage of it.  For many of them, football is a ticket out of poverty via an eventual professional career, a ticket for getting a college degree, or simply a ticket for pursuing a game they love.  
            As for the coaches, they are cogs – incredibly well-paid cogs – in a wheel they didn’t construct.  They have, of course, kept the wheel strong and functional.  Not all coaches are obscenely remunerated, but the ones I’m thinking of right now certainly are.  You know the ones I mean.  At any rate the athletes and the coaches are not the gatekeepers for the issue I’m raising.  College presidents, rabid fans (particularly rich alumni/donors), and politicians are.
Another bow before I proceed.  Coaches are one of the best things in America’s educational system.  I say this because of the ones who coached me, coached my sons, and those with whom I taught school for 4 decades.  Coaches have always symbolized and illustrated masculinity.  They have set many a youngster on the right path.  They have shown non-coaching teachers effective methods for teaching, as in “Don’t just tell’em; show’em.”  Coaches are normally considered icons in the school building.  I have often wondered if coaches realize the influence they have and the positive difference they make, even with students they don’t coach or teach.          
            That, of course, is the high school scene.  What about the college scene?  Just what are college presidents doing wrong?  They are allowing the tail to wag the dog.   They are allowing a non-academic endeavor to be the face of their institutions.  So you disagree?  What is the first thing you think of when you hear the words University of Alabama, University of Ohio, University of Georgia, Notre Dame, Ole Miss, Boston College, University of Florida … you get the drift. The list is long.  College presidents and enabling fans assume that everybody loves football and that the world therefore turns on it.  Forget the mathematics and history professors, as well as the students who are in the library on Saturday afternoon.  Never mind that students are in college to learn, not to be totally distracted for one-third of each year by the athletic juggernaut.
The emphasis on winning national championship rings is excessive.  When Georgia coach Mark Richt stated that football is about more than just getting rings, his destiny was sealed.  But Richt was right.  Unlike the NFL, college football is indeed about building men, or should be.  If not, why is it part of our educational enterprise?  Men who get their tickles from football should turn on the pro games and let colleges be the educational, people-building institutions they were intended to be.
           As for pro sports, here is one taxpayer tired of helping billionaires build their stadiums.  Let them build their own. Their games will still bring business to restaurants and hotels and help local economies.  As things stand now, taxpayers in quite a few cities are helping pay for stadiums they don’t care to go to, even if they could afford the tickets.  Besides, the stadiums will be torn down in a few years’ time for yet some other type project that a billionaire and some elected officials got together on.
           With colleges it is education gone awry.  With pro sports it is crony capitalism. National championship rings are too costly for the few they honor.  It’s time for a correction.

Roger Hines

1/2/16

No comments:

Post a Comment